Arizona Sets the Standard: Digital Asset Reserves Next Act

By Anastasia Dellaccio, Executive Director, Digital Chamber State Network

 The states that move early and with intention will attract capital, talent, and infrastructure that underpins the next generation of financial systems. 

Arizona has advanced one of the most comprehensive state-level digital asset reserve frameworks in the country. The legislature recently passed SB 1649 and SB 1042, sending them to Governor Katie Hobbs’ desk, but whether they will be signed into law still remains uncertain.  

SB 1649 establishes a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund managed by the State Treasurer, seeded with seized and forfeited digital assets at no new cost to taxpayers. The Treasurer is authorized to hold, invest, and where appropriate, lend those assets to generate returns. The bill proposes this effort be governed by a “cryptocurrency fair value” framework that evaluates assets on measurable criteria like market capitalization, network activity, and ecosystem development.  

SB 1042 would complement the reserve by enabling Arizona to diversify a small portion of public funds beyond traditional assets into high-potential digital assets. 

Why This Matters for Arizona’s Fiscal Future

As state debts and unfunded pension liabilities grow, governments face mounting pressure to protect long-term purchasing power without burdening taxpayers. Traditional portfolios have a mix of bonds, cash, and Treasuries. Digital assets offer states a new diversification opportunity, and Arizona’s framework is designed to capture that upside responsibly.

The digital asset industry has grown from roughly $10 billion in total market capitalization a decade ago to between $2 and $3 trillion today and shown increasing stability alongside sustained growth. Critically, SB 1649’s weighted, metrics-based framework for determining eligible assets means Arizona is not relying on a concentrated position on any single token. It is building a diversified digital asset allocation governed by principled, measurable criteria. That is the same discipline we expect from any well-managed public fund, now applied to an asset class most state treasuries haven’t yet had the tools to access.

Good Policy Built Right

Passing the legislation is step one. Implementation is the bigger challenge, and Arizona has the opportunity to set an example for state governments across the country

Diversify thoughtfully within the framework. SB 1649’s fair value framework was designed to allow Arizona to invest across a diversified mix of assets rather than concentrating exposure in a single token. As the Treasurer’s office operationalizes the fund, it should establish clear, repeatable processes for evaluating asset eligibility, reviewing portfolio composition regularly, and resisting any pressure to treat the fund as a single-asset vehicle. Diversification across digital assets with different use cases, network characteristics, and market dynamics is what transforms this reserve from a novelty into a durable fiscal tool.

Go beyond periodic attestation and build out the full reserve stack. As Arizona moves into the next phase of digital asset innovation, it should anchor its framework in transparency and durability. Across unclaimed assets, strategic reserves, and state stablecoin regulation, Arizona should aim for the ceiling in its digital asset administration. Traditional monthly audits show what was true at a single point in time, while programmatic, on-chain proof of reserves can show what is true continuously, every block, every second. But proof of reserves is only the foundation. Proof of composition provides transparency into the makeup of reserve assets to guard against concentration and tail risk, while proof of solvency can continuously demonstrate that total assets exceed liabilities.

Together, these layers distinguish a durable financial system from a compliance checkbox. This framework is ultimately about more than compliance; it’s about building enduring financial infrastructure and services that strengthen Arizona’s long-term fiscal stability. This also offers assurance to regulators that they can cover their bases by leveraging technology to hedge against risk.

Use the custodial flexibility the bill provides. SB 1649’s amended language recognizes secure custody solutions as qualified custodians, and the bill preserves the Treasurer’s ability to self-custody assets directly using technology providers. This is a wise choice, as it is typically more cost-effective, secure, and less exposed to third-party risk than relying exclusively on institutional custodians.

The Bigger Picture

Arizona’s move is not just about reserves. It is a signal. A signal that states are beginning to treat digital assets as a strategic asset class, a legitimate investment opportunity, and a clear message to innovators that Arizona is open for business.

The Digital Chamber State Network stands ready to help ensure what comes next matches the ambition of what has just been achieved.

Maryland Leads the Way: Turning Digital Asset Policy into Progress 

By Anastasia Dellaccio, Executive Director, Digital Chamber State Network | Jacqui Cooper, CEO, Maryland Blockchain Association 

At its best, digital asset policy is not only about markets or technology. It is about expanding access, strengthening protections, and creating real opportunities. For Maryland communities, from the unbanked to students, to entrepreneurs and workers across the state, they are seeing the benefits of clarity, coordination, and bipartisan action in their legislature to ensure that opportunities for jobs and innovation can flourish in their state. 

As Governor Wes Moore recently underscored at The Digital Chamber’s DC Blockchain Summit, “Innovative technologies like blockchain must work for everyone, including underbanked communities.” Maryland is not just embracing that vision. It is putting it into action.  

The 2026 legislative session will be remembered in Maryland as the year digital asset policy moved from conversation to commitment. As the 2026 legislative session draws to a close, the state has clearly asserted that Maryland is open for business. Lawmakers advanced a cohesive, bipartisan set of policies designed to move blockchain technology from theory into real-world applications and, on a broader scale, have positioned the state to compete for digital assets jobs by embracing responsible innovation. 

Building the Legal Foundation 

The 2026 legislative session will be remembered in Maryland as the year digital asset policy moved from conversation to commitment. 

At the heart of this session, progress is SB 154, which modernizes Maryland’s commercial code to recognize controllable electronic records. Though not flashy, this foundational move aligns UCC Article 12 and considers adopting provisions for Controllable Electronic Records. Simply stated, Maryland has modernized its commercial law to recognize and protect digital assets with the same rigor as traditional physical property. For consumers and businesses, this means digital assets are just like other asset classes, which can be owned, transferred, financed, and secured with distinct legal clarity. 

Putting Blockchain to Work 

Maryland is equally focused on harnessing blockchain technology for tangible public value. SB 168 / HB 810 is now headed to the Governor’s desk and means the state will actively study evaluating recording real property titles on blockchain-based systems. By piloting blockchain-based title verification, the state is making a concrete investment in modern technology that will reduce fraud, streamline transactions, and shine a light on systems traditionally burdened by inefficiency and opacity.  

Playing the Long Game 

Maryland’s work is smart and likely to be successful because it is built on a foundation of technical expertise. 

SB 376 / HB 470 establishes a Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Task Force, creating a standing engine for the state to continue to lead in policy development. This task force will offer a low-risk, low-cost, and transparent path to policymaking, while enabling lawmakers to build internal expertise, compare approaches taken by peer states, and assess real-world use cases. By doing this work before committing public resources or adopting specific rules, Maryland is more likely to continue their practical and bipartisan regulatory efforts. 

Meanwhile, SB 662 / HB 1355, the Maryland Stablecoin Act, is advancing a clear, credible framework for payment stablecoins, providing the consumer protections and banking standards necessary for digital dollars to flourish in the state’s economy. Although this legislation needs some improvement, primarily around reserves and a few other standards, it does a good job at adhering closely to the federal law, the GENIUS Act, and creating nimble efforts to adapt to future industry needs. 

Next Opportunities 

Not every blockchain legislative effort in Maryland advanced this session, and that matters too. 

Unfortunately, SB 759 / HB 859, which addressed staking and broader financial innovation, did not advance out of committee. Marylanders deserve access to staking-as-a-service offerings, as described in this legislation. The industry’s coalition has engaged in educating policymakers around this topic, and staking legislation remains a top priority as it signals a long-term commitment to sophisticated financial technology.  

The Maryland Blockchain Association calls these education efforts its “Lighthouse” strategy and will continue to push for clarity that attracts serious players and builds a real, durable digital assets innovation ecosystem. 

The next opportunity is the Maryland BlockchAIn Bootcamp & Workforce Expo, will be held from July 13–17, 2026, at Capitol Technology University. The Expo will gather consumers, students, businesses, state leaders, and the new cohort of The Blockchain Legal Institute’s Business of Blockchain Interns to demonstrate real-world applications for blockchain technology. A Replicable Blueprint 

Groups that share Maryland’s ambition are beginning to take root in other states. Together, The Digital Chamber’s State Network and the Maryland Blockchain Association have partnered to help increase awareness of the facts around blockchain.  

We commend the Maryland lawmakers who drove this progress, including Delegate Boafo, Senator Watson, Delegate Amprey, Senator Hayes, and Senator West. Their leadership reflects exactly the kind of policymaking this moment demands, grounded not just in innovation, but in impact. We look forward to our continued work with them to ensure that Maryland continues to prioritize the values of privacy, freedom, and innovation that Marylanders deserve. 

TDC DeFi Policy Principles

Non-Custodial DeFi Policy Principles 

  1. Regulatory Obligations Should Follow Custody or Control 
    • Financial regulatory obligations should apply to entities that custody user assets or exercise discretionary control over transactions on behalf of users. 
  1. Non-Custodial Developers Are Not Money Transmitters 
    • Developers who do not hold or control users’ digital assets should not be subject to financial regulations simply for building, publishing, or maintaining open-source DeFi software. 
  1. Permissionless Protocols Are Infrastructure, Not Intermediaries 
    • Open source, permissionless protocols are core digital infrastructure, and should be treated as such.  Classifying these protocols as financial intermediaries, whether as money transmitters, money services businesses, or other financial institutions, fundamentally mischaracterizes what they are and how they function. 
  1. Software Maintenance Does Not Create Financial Intermediary Status 
    • Financial regulators should clarify that maintaining, upgrading, or debugging non-custodial protocols, liquidity pools, smart contracts, oracles, or similar infrastructure does not make an individual or organization a financial intermediary. 
  1. Developer Protections Apply Across the Protocol Lifecycle 
    • Legal protections for open-source protocol development should extend to the full lifecycle of decentralized systems, including deployment, upgrades, security improvements, and ongoing maintenance. 
  1. Law Should Distinguish Between Digital Assets and Smart Contract Software 
    • Regulatory frameworks should clearly differentiate between digital assets, which function as property, and open-source smart contracts, which are software infrastructure (not property). 
  1. Developers Are Not Liable for Third-Party Use of Open Infrastructure 
    • Developers who create open-source software tools should not face civil or criminal liability solely for the independent actions of third parties who use those tools. 

Intermediated (Institutional) DeFi Policy Principles 

  1. Intermediaries Bear Compliance Obligations When Using DeFi 
    • Financial intermediaries and custodians that access DeFi protocols on behalf of clients should remain responsible for regulatory compliance obligations. 
    • Developers who build or maintain related smart contract software should not be treated as financial intermediaries solely for creating the underlying code. 
  1. Regulatory Obligations Follow Institutional Control 
    • Maintaining or upgrading decentralized infrastructure should not trigger financial intermediary status, though regulatory and data protection obligations should apply when such systems are created, owned, and operated by financial institutions. 
    1. Protect Proprietary Financial Software and Assign Responsibility Accordingly
      • When financial infrastructure is built using proprietary code or intellectual property—such as smart contracts, liquidity pools, vaults, algorithms, or AI agents—it should not be treated as open-source software.
      • Entities that control or deploy such proprietary systems should bear regulatory obligations proportionate to the financial activities those systems perform on behalf of users. 
      1. Institutional Use of DeFi Supports Fiduciary Obligations 
        • Digital asset institutions have the fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of their clients.
        • Institutions should therefore not be excluded from leveraging DeFi vaults, protocols and platforms to perform their duty of best execution. 

          If you have any questions, please reach out to policy@digitalchamber.org

          AI Agent Identity & Security Standards

          Jean-Philippe Beaudet & Jonathan Rufrano

          Why We Filed 

          Over the past several weeks, TDC’s AI + Quantum and Compliance & Cybersecurity Working Groups led the preparation and submission of two formal public comments to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Both filings respond to government requests for industry input on how AI agent systems should be identified, authenticated, authorized, and secured – questions that sit squarely at the intersection of our members’ work. 

          As autonomous agents gain the ability to execute financial transactions, access proprietary data, call APIs, and interact with other agents, the rules governing their identity and authority will shape the architecture of the systems your organizations are building right now. TDC’s goal in filing is to ensure that those rules are informed by the technical reality our members navigate daily and to establish TDC as a credible, expert voice in a policy space that will define AI deployment for years to come. 

          What We Responded To 

          Filing 1: NIST CAISI – Security Considerations for AI Agents (March 2026) 

          The Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) requested information on security threats, risks, and practices affecting AI agent systems across the full deployment lifecycle. TDC’s response drew on members’ hands-on experience in financial services, digital asset custody, blockchain security infrastructure, and agentic commerce. 

          Filing 2: NIST NCCoE – Software and AI Agent Identity and Authorization (April 2026)

          The National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) proposed a new project exploring how software and AI agents should be identified and authorized, initially scoped to enterprise deployments. TDC’s response addressed six question categories spanning use cases, existing standards, identification, authentication, authorization, auditing, and prompt injection defense. 

          Our High-Level Recommendations 

          Core principle: Build from existing standards rather than creating parallel AI-specific frameworks from scratch. The building blocks already exist—they need to be extended, not reinvented. 

          Across both filings, TDC advanced four interconnected recommendations: 

          1. Expand the project scope beyond enterprise-only use cases. Consumer-facing and government AI agent deployments introduce identity and authorization risks that enterprise frameworks may not address – and standards that fail to account for all three segments will produce gaps from day one. 
          2. Prioritize adaptation of mature, widely-deployed protocols. Standards like OAuth 2.0, NIST SP 800-63, SPIFFE/SPIRE, W3C Verifiable Credentials, and ISO/IEC 18013 (mDL) already provide robust foundations. The right approach is to extend these – not replace them – to accommodate non-human, autonomous actors.
          3. Treat agent identity and authorization as distinct layers. Authentication establishes who an agent is; authorization determines what it is permitted to do. Conflating these layers is a root cause of current over-permissioning in agentic deployments. 
          4. Design for accountability at scale. Every agent action should be cryptographically attributable to a verifiable identity, a delegating human principal, and an auditable authorization chain – before those agents are managing financial assets or acting across enterprise systems.

          If you have any questions, please reach out to policy@digitalchamber.org

          Delaware Senate Moves Forward on Blockchain Task Force

          What Happened:  

          On March 24, 2026, Anastasia Dellaccio, Executive Director of State and Regional Affairs at TDC State Network, testified before the Delaware State Senate in support of SCR 143 legislation sponsored by Senator Darius J. Brown and Rep. Michael Smith to create a task force evaluating blockchain and digital innovation policy in Delaware. 

          Following her testimony, SCR 143 passed the committee. Delaware continues to lead on financial innovation, demonstrating its commitment to thoughtful, forward-looking policies that support the growth of blockchain and digital technology.

          Why it matters: 

          • Delaware is home to over 1 million businesses, including 60% of the Fortune 500 companies, and is a cornerstone of the U.S. financial services sector.
          • The task force offers a low-risk, low-cost, transparent pathway to explore blockchain applications, engage with industry, and build expertise before adopting policies. 
          • States are increasingly shaping digital asset rules as federal policy evolves. 

          Dellaccio’s Take: 

          Blockchain studies and task forces such as the one proposed here offer a low-risk, low-cost, and transparent pathway to policymaking in a highly technical and rapidly evolving area. They allow lawmakers to build internal expertise, compare approaches across jurisdictions, engage with industry, and evaluate practical use cases before committing public resources or adopting policies that may become difficult to unwind. If developed in a way that embraces innovation while establishing appropriate consumer protections, this Task Force can provide Delaware with clear, implementation-ready guidance that strengthens the state’s economic competitiveness, supports its workforce, and ensures it remains at the center of modern financial infrastructure.”  

          Looking Ahead:  

          SCR 143 could lead to pilot programs, regulatory frameworks, new governance structures like DUNAs, and applications in digital identity, supply chain tracking, and modernizing land and property records. 

          You can watch her full testimony here or read the full written testimony below:  

          If you have any questions, please reach out to policy@digitalchamber.org

          Five State Blockchain Leaders Awarded First TDC State Network Grants at the DC Blockchain Summit 2026

          Five organizations from across the United States were recognized at the DC Blockchain Summit as the first recipients of The Digital Chamber’s State Network grants. The program supports grassroots leaders advancing digital asset education, non-partisan policy development, and adoption at the state level.

          Last week at the DC Blockchain Summit, The Digital Chamber’s State Network announced the first-ever recipients of its competitive grant program. Selected from 41 applicants nationwide, five organizations from Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Utah, and West Virginia were recognized for their work advancing digital asset education and policy in their states.

          Why it matters:
          State governments are playing an increasingly important role in shaping the regulatory environment for digital assets. By supporting grassroots leaders who are working directly with policymakers and communities, TDC’s State Network aims to accelerate education, collaboration, policy development, and responsible blockchain adoption across the country.

          “TDC’s State Network is about empowering grassroots leaders advocating for smart digital asset policy in their states,” said Anastasia Dellaccio, Executive Director of TDC’s State Network. “These organizations are on the front lines of digital asset policy development, and the work they are doing to develop sensible solutions at the state level is critical to the future of the industry nationwide.”

          Each organization received $2,000 in funding to support projects that strengthen engagement between policymakers, industry leaders, and local communities.

          Meet the 2026 Grant Recipients

          Convergence Tech Policy Institute (C:TPI)
          C:TPI is a global think tank in Illinois, focused on the intersection of AI, blockchain, and quantum policy. With support from this grant, the organization will host a reception during the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Summit in Chicago this July, bringing together policymakers and technology leaders to discuss cybersecurity and emerging technology governance.

          Maryland Blockchain Association (MDBA)
          The Maryland Blockchain Association is a nonprofit coalition uniting industry, government, and academia to advance Bitcoin, Web3 innovation, and responsible digital asset policy across the state. Led by Jacqueline Cooper, Esq., known in the community as “CryptoMom2,” MDBA is actively engaged in shaping Maryland’s legislative landscape on issues ranging from blockchain real estate applications and cryptocurrency staking to stablecoin legislation and the state’s Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Task Force. Their grant will support Blockchain Bootcamp, a career-focused conference coming to Maryland this July.

          Detroit Blockchain Center (DBC)
          The Detroit Blockchain Center is Michigan’s premier 501(c)(3) organization, focused on blockchain, crypto, AI, and emerging technology education. Founded in 2018, the organization helps individuals and institutions better understand decentralized technologies while supporting startups building in the state. The grant will help launch DBC’s policy education track, including legislative roundtables, fireside discussions, and voter education content designed to make digital asset policy more accessible to Michigan stakeholders.

          Utah Blockchain Coalition (UBC)
          The Utah Blockchain Coalition advances blockchain-focused public policy initiatives and works to educate government officials on the benefits of the technology. With this grant, UBC will convene elected officials, innovators, and policy advocates for a working session on key blockchain trends and how Utah can position itself for responsible digital asset adoption.

          West Virginia Blockchain Foundation
          The West Virginia Blockchain Foundation connects legislators, universities, and communities across Appalachia to the economic and technological opportunities created by blockchain and emerging technologies. Their grant will support a series of in-person and virtual policy education workshops engaging state legislators, county officials, student leaders, and community stakeholders across West Virginia and the greater Ohio Valley.

          What’s Next

          These five organizations represent the kind of grassroots leadership driving progress in digital asset policy at the state level. As they begin implementing their projects throughout 2026, The Digital Chamber’s State Network will continue supporting their work through collaboration, resources, and connections across the digital asset ecosystem.

          If you missed the announcement at the DC Blockchain Summit, you can watch the full session here.

          TDC’s State Network Announces its First Competitive Grant Winners  

          Washington, DC (March 17, 2026) — At the DC Blockchain Summit today, The Digital Chamber awarded the first TDC State Network grants to organizations from Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Utah, and West Virginia. These groups stood out from 41 applicants for their action-oriented proposals aimed at advancing education, policy development, and adoption of digital assets in their states.  
           
          “TDC’s State Network is about empowering grassroots leaders that are advocating for smart digital asset policy at the state level.  We have found the best way to support these local builders, many of whom are volunteers, is to provide funding that allows them to turn their policy initiatives into action. These leading organizations are on the front line of digital asset policy action in their states, and the contributions they make towards developing sensible policy solutions at the state level is critical to the future of the industry across the nation.” said State Network’s Executive Director, Anastasia Dellaccio. 
           
          Each recipient was selected based on key criteria, including stated goals and policy alignment with TDC’s digital assets policy goals, and will receive $2000 to continue to grow in their community. 

          The recipients announced today at the DC Blockchain Summit are: 
           
          Illinois: The Convergence Tech Policy Institute (C:TPI) from Illinois is a global think tank mapping AI, blockchain, and quantum policy collisions to deliver trusted safeguards before $10T+ in infrastructure is at risk. They plan to build the Policy Convergence Index™ and Chicago Accord to secure a quantum-safe internet—where tech converges, policy leads. With their grant money, they plan to host a reception during the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) summit in Chicago, July 27-29, 2026, focused on the NCSL Tech & Communications Committee and the NCSL Cyber-security & Privacy Task Force.  

          Maryland: The Maryland Blockchain Association (MDBA) is a nonprofit coalition that is focusing on uniting and educating industry, government, and academia within Maryland to advance Bitcoin, Web3 innovation, and responsible digital asset policy throughout the state.  This year, the MDBA will be hosting a major conference, the Blockchain Bootcamp, bringing industry participants to Maryland to exhibit and lead career development workshops from July 13th to July 17th. This will be the first major conference in Maryland focusing on blockchain and related technology career opportunities. Under the leadership of Jacqueline Cooper, Esq.—a prominent legal expert, educator, entrepreneur, and author known as “CryptoMom2″—the association focuses on bridging knowledge gaps and fostering a skilled workforce for high-demand careers in the digital economy. In 2026, the MDBA is actively shaping Maryland’s legislative landscape by participating in supporting education across a variety of introduced legislation to include blockchain applications (real estate), cryptocurrency staking, a stablecoin reserve bill, and the formalization of the state’s Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Task Force, and as well as advocating for commercial law updates to the Uniform Commercial Code.  The Association and the volunteers supporting the organization continue to empower Marylanders with the technical literacy and tools necessary to thrive in the “Regulatory Renaissance.” 

          Michigan: The Detroit Blockchain Center (DBC) is the state’s premier 501(c)(3) dedicated to blockchain, crypto, AI, and emerging tech education. As the leading blockchain educator, formed in 2018 in Michigan, the Detroit Blockchain Center helps individuals and organizations better understand blockchain/web3 technology; attracts and encourages outside investments into businesses building on decentralized systems in Michigan; and creates opportunities for area blockchain/Web3 startups and entrepreneurs. This grant will serve as a seed investment to launch and strengthen DBC’s policy education track, delivered through events, legislative roundtables, fireside discussions, and voter education/awareness content that translates digital-asset policy into plain language for Michigan stakeholders. 

           
          Utah: The Utah Blockchain Coalition is an association in Utah that drives blockchain-centric public policy initiatives to educate government officials about the benefits of blockchain technology and a strong community ecosystem in Utah. With this grant, the UBC plans to convene elected officials, innovators, and policy advocates for a discussion and informative working session around key blockchain trends and how Utah should position itself legislatively for digital asset adoption. 
           
          West Virginia: The West Virginia Blockchain Foundation works to expand digital asset education and economic opportunities by connecting legislators, universities, and communities across Appalachia to the benefits of blockchain and emerging technologies. With this grant, the WV Blockchain Foundation will deliver a series of in-person and virtual blockchain policy education workshops designed to engage state legislators, county officials, student leaders, and community stakeholders across West Virginia and the greater Ohio Valley. 

          ABOUT THE DIGITAL CHAMBER’S STATE NETWORK  

          The Digital Chamber’s State Network, a project of The Digital Chamber, is a non-partisan program that establishes a collaborative ecosystem connecting policymakers, regulators, industry, and innovators to advance blockchain adoption and digital asset integration across the United States.  
            
          ABOUT THE DIGITAL CHAMBER  

          The Digital Chamber is a non-profit organization committed to promoting global blockchain adoption. We envision a fair and inclusive digital and financial ecosystem where everyone has the opportunity to participate. Access to digital assets is not merely a technological advancement but a fundamental human right, crucial for economic and social empowerment. Through targeted education, advocacy, and strategic collaborations with government and industry stakeholders, we drive innovation and shape policies that create a favorable environment for the blockchain technology ecosystem.   

          The Digital Chamber’s umbrella includes: CryptoUK, Digital Power Network (DPN), TDC’s Digital State Network, and Treasury Council.  

          ###  

          For media inquiries, contact press@digitalchamber.org   

           Follow The Digital Chamber I LinkedIn I Twitter I Instagram  

          Money20/20 Announces Strategic Partnership with The Digital Chamber


          Partnership aims to connect fintech leaders with policymakers shaping digital asset policy

          Washington, DC – (March 17, 2026) — Money20/20, the world’s leading fintech show and the place where money does business, today announced a strategic partnership with The Digital Chamber (TDC), the largest digital asset and blockchain trade association in the United States. The partnership was announced at The Digital Chamber’s annual DC Blockchain Summit in Washington DC kicking off the two-day event’s convergence of policymakers, regulators, and industry leaders discussing the future of blockchain and digital asset policy.

          The collaboration brings together Money20/20’s global fintech community and The Digital Chamber’s leadership in digital asset policy at a time when tokenization, stablecoins, and blockchain-based financial systems are becoming an increasingly important part of global finance.

          The partnership will span key moments across the year, beginning with the DC Blockchain Summit 2026 and including Money20/20 USA 2026, with the shared goal of strengthening the connection between policy discussions. The partnership will include exclusive roundtables and podcasts in addition to thought leadership work in Washington.

          It will also support The Intersection: Where TradFi & DeFi Converge, a Money20/20 global initiative exploring how traditional financial institutions and decentralized financial technologies are increasingly shaping a shared financial ecosystem.

          Scarlett Sieber, Chief Strategy and Growth Officer of Money20/20, said:

          “Money20/20 is where the most trusted institutions in finance meet the innovators building what comes next. Business gets done here at an unprecedented pace because of the seniority and diversity of our audience, bringing together global banks, fintech leaders, payment networks, and digital asset pioneers under one roof. That is why we are genuinely excited to partner with The Digital Chamber. Cody Carbone and his team are among the most credible and influential voices in digital asset policy, and together we can deepen the connection between traditional institutions and the builders driving the real‑world convergence of TradFi and DeFi.”

          Cody Carbone, CEO of The Digital Chamber, said:

          “The Digital Chamber’s mission has always been to connect policymakers with the innovators building the future of financial technology. Partnering with Money20/20 strengthens that mission by bringing policymakers, fintech leaders, and digital asset builders into the same room. Together, we will elevate global understandng of digital assets and blockchain technology and accelerate their responsible growth around the world.”

          About Money20/20

          Launched by industry insiders in 2012, Money20/20 has rapidly become the heartbeat of the global fintech ecosystem. Over the last decade, the most innovative, fast‑moving ideas and companies have driven their growth on our platform. Mastercard, Airwallex, J.P. Morgan, SHIELD, GCash, Stripe, Google, Visa, Adyen, and more make transformational deals and raise their global profile with us. Money20/20 attracts leaders from the world’s greatest banks, payments companies, VC firms, regulators, and media platforms — convening to cut industry‑shaping deals, build world‑changing partnerships, and unlock future‑defining opportunities in Las Vegas (October 18–21, 2026), Amsterdam (June 2–4, 2026), Riyadh (September 14–16, 2026), and Bangkok (April 21–23, 2026). Money20/20 is where the world’s fintech leaders convene to grow their brands. Money20/20 is part of Informa PLC. Follow Money20/20 on X and LinkedIn for show developments and updates.

          About The Digital Chamber

          The Digital Chamber is a non-profit organization committed to promoting global blockchain adoption. We envision a fair and inclusive digital and financial ecosystem where everyone has the opportunity to participate. Access to digital assets is not merely a technological advancement but a fundamental human right, crucial for economic and social empowerment. Through targeted education, advocacy, and strategic collaborations with government and industry stakeholders, we drive innovation and shape policies that create a favorable environment for the blockchain technology ecosystem. 

          Major partners and affiliates of The Digital Chamber include: CryptoUK and Digital Power Network.

          ###   

          Media Contacts

          Tina Loncaric
          Global Head of PR
          tina@money2020.com
          M: +1 469 288 5556


          Megan Thorpe
          Communications Director, The Digital Chamber
          press@digitalchamber.org
          M: +1 202 215 1362

          TDC Prediction Markets Working Group Framework for Responsible Prediction Markets

          1. Purpose  

          The Prediction Markets Working Group (“PMWG”) supports the responsible development and regulation of CFTC-regulated prediction markets as federally regulated derivatives markets that facilitate price discovery, risk management, and information aggregation. This is an important priority for The Digital Chamber (TDC), as blockchain-enabled technologies will continue to be implemented into various forms of commodities trading, including prediction markets, due to their transparency-enabling features and near instantaneous settlement and trade finality capabilities.   

          2. Core Policy Principles  

          TDC advances the following principles to guide our prediction market advocacy work:  

          Deep Industry and Technical Knowledge: Members of the PMWG include former CFTC-staff, regulated designated contract markets (“DCM”s), future commission merchants (“FCM”s), legal experts, and infrastructure service providers. Our work is focused on bringing a deep technical and legal understanding of how these markets operate and are regulated. We aim to bring advanced subject-matter expertise to our efforts to ensure the regulations covering this growing industry are practical and effective.   

          Federal Regulatory Clarity and Preemption: Where prediction markets operate as CFTC-regulated event contract markets, federal commodities law should provide the exclusive regulatory framework. Regulatory fragmentation undermines market stability and consumer protection. This includes any future developments at the CFTC related to interactions of DCMs with blockchain-enabled technologies like stablecoins, public or DeFi orderbooks, and related technologies as deemed appropriate by federal regulators.  

          Market Integrity and Consumer Protections: The public needs to trust event-contracts are fair for these products to reach their full potential. Event contract markets should maintain robust listing standards, anti-manipulation controls, transparency, margin and capital safeguards, and surveillance mechanisms consistent with derivatives market best practices. 

          Distinction from Gambling Frameworks: Just as futures were once described as “gambling on grain” prediction markets face opposition from certain states who view the products as gambling. However, prediction markets structured on DCMs differ meaningfully from traditional gambling models in governance, clearing, capital controls, and risk management. Policy frameworks must reflect those distinctions. 

          Principled Contract Designs: Event contracts should be evaluated under clear, administrable standards that consider economic purpose, susceptibility to manipulation, and alignment with the public interest. 

          U.S. Leadership in Financial Innovation: The United States should lead in establishing modern regulatory frameworks for information markets; ensuring competitiveness while safeguarding systemic integrity. 

            

          3. Policy Priorities   

          Objective 1: Encourage the CFTC to initiate formal rulemaking specific to prediction markets to reduce ambiguity and promote consistent regulatory treatment 

          Key Results: Submit at least one comprehensive comment letter advocating for tailored rulemaking. Conduct 5+ meetings with senior CFTC staff. Publish a public policy paper outlining model regulatory principles. 

          Objective 2: Clarify the scope of federal authority over CFTC-regulated event contracts and reduce uncertainty created by overlapping state gaming enforcement. 

          Key Results: Publish a federal preemption legal analysis. Develop model federal statutory clarification language, if necessary.  

          Objective 3: Support a coherent national framework through strategic litigation involvement in in state vs. DCM event contract litigation.  

          Key Results: File at least one amicus brief in active litigation involving state regulators and CFTC-regulated prediction market operators. Produce a public explainer on the legal issues at stake in federal vs. state jurisdiction disputes.  

          Objective 4: Demonstrate that the industry supports strong market integrity and consumer protections.  

          Key Results: Publish a Prediction Market Best Practices Framework. Convene 3 roundtables with operators, academics, and compliance experts. Develop recommended disclosure and transparency standards for event contracts.  

          Objective 5: Educate state regulators and stakeholders on the federal framework governing CFTC-regulated prediction markets and distinguish derivatives markets from traditional gaming.

          Key Results: Develop a state policymaker briefing toolkit. Publish a white paper explaining interaction between state gaming laws and federally regulated derivatives markets. Include F&Qs where helpful clearing up. 

          If you have any questions, please reach out to policy@digitalchamber.org

          What Is DeAI?  

          By Jean-Philippe Beaudet 

          Key Provisions  

          As Congress and state legislatures advance Artificial Intelligence (AI) legislation, TDC and its members seek to clarify, expand, and stress the concept of “open AI” in design by providing a more comprehensive definition drawn from the blockchain industry. Within our community, these systems are more commonly referred to as “Decentralized AI” or “Blockchain-Based AI.” For consistency, we use the term “Decentralized AI” or DeAI. 

          Importantly, Decentralized AI refers to more than open-source models. It encompasses the entire AI technology stack – including compute, data, models, and applications – built on public blockchain infrastructure. By distributing ownership, access, contributions, and governance across these layers, Decentralized AI Systems aim to enhance transparency, accessibility, resiliency, and public trust, and this multi-layered approach reimagines how AI can be developed, trained, deployed, and maintained. 

          Because Decentralized AI Systems are built on public blockchains, the concept of “openness” is inherently embedded through transparent ledgers, open access, and decentralized governance. However, both openness and decentralization can vary across each layer of the system. While some components may be entirely public and open-source, others may incorporate permissioning or privacy-preserving tools depending on the use case. Nonetheless, Decentralized AI Systems overall offer unique and compelling benefits that cannot be achieved under traditional, centralized architectures. 

          Below we outline the following four core layers of the Decentralized AI technology stack, each of which plays an integral role in creating a resilient and participatory AI ecosystem: 

          Across those four layers: 

          Computation. DeAI aggregates training and inference across many independent operators (from idle gaming PCs to small data centers) via marketplaces that route and verify jobs. This broadens access, trims costs, eases grid hotspots by spreading load geographically, and hardens resilience. No single facility or vendor becomes a choke point. Contributors are paid automatically for provable work, unlocking latent capacity at scale. 

          Example: A biotech startup splits a large protein-folding job into micro-tasks that idle gaming PCs in 40 states process overnight, paying each node a few cents in crypto for its GPU time. When a surge of demand hits Europe the next morning, spare servers in university labs automatically join the mesh, scaling the cluster without a single new data- center rack. 

          Data. Decentralized storage scatters encrypted shards across multiple locations, boosting availability while removing single points of failure. Providers can opt-in bandwidth or datasets and receive compensation. With zero-knowledge techniques and trusted execution, models learn from sensitive data without exposing it, enabling privacy-preserving AI in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance. 

          Example: Cancer patients opt in to share anonymized MRI scans that are sliced, encrypted, and scattered across hundreds of storage nodes; researchers query the dataset with zero- knowledge proofs that reveal insights but never raw images. Each time the dataset powers a published paper, the smart contract behind it releases token rewards to the original donors and storage providers. 

          Model. Distributed version control and on-chain governance make every fine-tune, weight change, and policy toggle auditable. Usage-based rewards flow to creators and curators, aligning incentives for openness and quality. Public lineage (what data, which versions, who approved) replaces black-box opacity with transparent accountability and fast rollbacks when issues arise. 

          Example: An open-source language model lives on a permissioned blockchain where every fine-tuning commit, weight change, and contributor wallet is publicly logged; governance tokens let the community approve or roll back updates. Whenever an app calls the model’s API, a micro-payment is auto-split among all recorded contributors, turning transparency into ongoing revenue. 

          Application. Builders compose the above layers to ship agents and apps that spin up inference wherever capacity is cheapest or closest to users. Startups and SMEs get enterprise-grade capability at low marginal cost, while royalties and revenue sharing flow automatically to upstream contributors to fuel a sustainable, participatory AI economy. 

          Example: A lightweight AI agent built on the above-described shared models handles real- time customer support for thousands of small e-commerce sites, spinning up inference jobs on whichever community GPUs are cheapest at that moment. Because the cost is pennies per chat, even a two-person shop can deploy enterprise-grade AI while the agent’s creators earn royalties every time it solves a ticket. 

          Bonus: Decentralized Operating System. A combination of each of the four layers form a decentralized AI operating system (deAIOS)—a secure, verifiable, and composable foundation for AI development that provides not only access to models, but also tamper-resistant, provable AI development environments. It should be noted that while fully Decentralized AI Systems incorporate decentralization at each layer of the stack above, there are many methods of combining decentralized and centralized layers that still allow for the benefits of decentralization. 

          Conclusion 

          With this explanation in place, it becomes clear that Decentralized AI Systems represent a fundamentally different approach to building, operating, and governing artificial intelligence. By distributing control across infrastructure, data, models, and applications, these systems offer unique advantages in terms of transparency, security, scalability, and resilience. 

          This piece is part of an ongoing series and is substantially pulled from TDC’s Bipartisan House AI Taskforce Report on Artificial Intelligence—Open & Closed Systems, published in June 2025.